๐Ÿ“ž Call Now
Case-study-banner-of- Full Mouth-Rehabilitation-of-Worn-Dentition

Full Mouth Dental Implant Rehabilitation for Periodontally Compromised Patient

A patient came to us with advanced periodontal disease, a condition where the supporting structures of the teeth progressively deteriorate. Over time, this leads to gum recession, bone loss, tooth mobility, and ultimately tooth loss.

The patientโ€™s primary concerns were difficulty in chewing, discomfort while eating, and a significant loss of confidence due to compromised oral health. Clinical examination confirmed multiple non-restorable teeth with severe bone loss.

Diagnosis & Digital Planning

Accurate diagnosis and meticulous planning formed the foundation of this case.

The process included:

  • Detailed consultation and chief complaint evaluation
  • 3D intraoral scans
  • 3D CBCT imaging to assess bone availability
  • Virtual implant planning using simulation software

These digital tools allowed precise assessment of:

  • Available bone structure
  • Proximity to nerves and sinuses
  • Soft tissue considerations
  • Optimal implant positioning

A computer-guided surgical protocol was selected to minimize surgical risk and improve predictability.

Treatment Approach

The rehabilitation was divided into two clearly defined phases:

Phase 1: Surgical Phase

All non-restorable teeth were atraumatically extracted.

Using a customized 3D surgical guide, implants were strategically placed through a guided approach rather than relying on conventional freehand methods. This significantly improved accuracy and reduced surgical invasiveness.

The treatment plan included:

  • All-on-6 in the maxilla
  • All-on-6 in the mandible

A total of twelve implants were placed with precise angulation and depth control.

The use of guided surgery helped:

  • Minimize risk of infection
  • Reduce the need for extensive bone grafting
  • Preserve vital anatomical structures
  • Achieve optimal primary stability

Following the surgical phase, a provisional prosthesis was delivered after the initial healing period of 1โ€“2 weeks.

Phase 2: Prosthetic Phase

After a healing period of approximately 3โ€“6 months, during which osseointegration occurred, the implants fused successfully with the jawbone.

Once integration was confirmed:

  • Final digital impressions were taken
  • A definitive prosthetic framework was fabricated
  • Permanent prostheses were delivered

The final restoration provided structural support, aesthetic harmony, and functional efficiency.

Clinical Outcome

The transformation extended beyond dental rehabilitation.

Before treatment, the patient experienced:

  • Difficulty chewing
  • Persistent discomfort
  • Reduced self-esteem
Dr-Jaydev-doing-dental-procedure

After completion of treatment, the patient regained:

  • Stable, fixed teeth
  • Comfortable chewing function
  • Improved facial support
  • Renewed confidence
Dr-Jaydev-doing-dental-procedure

After completion of treatment, the patient regained:

  • Stable, fixed teeth
  • Comfortable chewing function
  • Improved facial support
  • Renewed confidence

Key Clinical Advantages of the Approach

๎’

3D digital planning for precision

๎’

Guided implant placement for safety and predictability

๎’

Reduced surgical trauma

๎’

Optimized implant positioning

๎’

Long-term functional stability

๎’

Aesthetic smile restoration